>>>>>> No need. Several people, whom YOU deferred to as "experts," already >>>>>> outted >>>>>> you on the fake boarding pass. And, as I said, I don't give a rat's >>>>>> ass >>>>>> whether you went to Cuba. I have better things to do with my time.
>>>>> Funny NONE of the people claimed to be "EXPERTS" Davey in fact TWO >>>>> of >>>>>them freely admitted they were NOT.
>>>> In your mind that makes a person an expert, as PROVED by your >>>> frequently claiming I'm an expert. >>>> Either that, or you're so drunk you don't understand when someone >>>> informs you that they're not an expert.
>>> No, Kunt, you ATILL don't get it. I know that you are not an expert,
>> I do get that you are UNABLE to resist your drunken compulsion to >> claim I am an expert. I've understood this for a while. >> It appears everyone reading also understands. Certainly no one is >> willing to offer a counter to the claim. Not even you.
>>>neither is your fairy buddy Moore. But you two are terribly strident with >>>your claims that the photos ARE faked.
>> I've made no such claim.
> Let's see if we understand each other, now you are admitting they are >most likely genuine!
As I stated, and you dishonestly snipped, I believe they are fake. This is a long way from the bogus FACT CLAIM you mistakenly assign me.
"you are reading Moore's SELECTIVE material that is HIGHLY edited." Kenneth Robert Pangborn claiming in misc.legal that David Moore can and does edit Google's Usenet archive. Message-ID: <n9Sfm.1372$nh2.455@nwrddc02.gnilink.net>
>>>>>>> No need. Several people, whom YOU deferred to as "experts," already >>>>>>> outted >>>>>>> you on the fake boarding pass. And, as I said, I don't give a rat's >>>>>>> ass >>>>>>> whether you went to Cuba. I have better things to do with my time.
>>>>>> Funny NONE of the people claimed to be "EXPERTS" Davey in fact TWO >>>>>> of >>>>>>them freely admitted they were NOT.
>>>>> In your mind that makes a person an expert, as PROVED by your >>>>> frequently claiming I'm an expert. >>>>> Either that, or you're so drunk you don't understand when someone >>>>> informs you that they're not an expert.
>>>> No, Kunt, you ATILL don't get it. I know that you are not an expert,
>>> I do get that you are UNABLE to resist your drunken compulsion to >>> claim I am an expert. I've understood this for a while. >>> It appears everyone reading also understands. Certainly no one is >>> willing to offer a counter to the claim. Not even you.
>>>>neither is your fairy buddy Moore. But you two are terribly strident >>>>with >>>>your claims that the photos ARE faked.
>>> I've made no such claim.
>> Let's see if we understand each other, now you are admitting they are >>most likely genuine!
> As I stated, and you dishonestly snipped, I believe they are fake.
Okay then PROVE IT! You can't have it both ways Kunt. If you believe they are fake make YOUR CASE or STFU!!!
يرجى تحديث اسم الشهرة الخاص بك على صفحة إعدادات الاشتراك قبل النشر.
لا يوجد لديك الإذن المطلوب للنشر.
تغير موضوع المناقشة إلى "David and the link to the photos he claims are faked - http://s283.photobucket.com/al bums/kk302/kenPphotos" بواسطة Kent Wills
Me: "I suspect your stalking is due to the use and abuse of illegal drugs, Greg. Is the reason for your stalking the members of alt.friends due to the use and abuse of illegal drugs?
Gregory Scott Hanson, wife beater and child abuser: "Of course."
"My family's case is for Neglect, but we are treated in virtually every regard as child abusers, marked on the Child Abuse registry, for example." -- Greg Scott Hanson telling Usenet he's a FOUNDED child abuser. Message-ID: <35120b16.0401111639.6825febd@posting.google.com>
" ... But there ought to be conferences and studies on how to curb minority overpopulation, repatriate minorities abroad, imprison more minorities, increase use of the death penalty and divest minorities of the power they have usurped over us in recent years. That would address the most pressing problems of our day. ... " April 2000, Gregory Hanson http://www.nationalist.org/ATW/2000/040101.html#Hanson
With the Christmas season upon us again, my stepdaughter was launching into her usual tirade of "I need this" (Nintendo 64 games, Pokemon, videos, Rhianna CD, etc.) After enduring a trip through Kmart, I was at my wits end. I took the kid home and filled the bathtub with water. Then I dunked the brat's head under the water and counted out a full minute, with her flailing her arms. I brought her up and she gasped for air. When she'd caught her breath, I asked her, "When you were under that water, did you 'need' Nintendo? Pokemon? Rhianna?" She shook her head. "What were you thinking about?" I prodded. She told me "I was thinking that I needed air."
"Now you know the difference between 'need' and 'want'" I exclaimed triumphantly.
يرجى تحديث اسم الشهرة الخاص بك على صفحة إعدادات الاشتراك قبل النشر.
لا يوجد لديك الإذن المطلوب للنشر.
تغير موضوع المناقشة إلى "Wills and the link to the photos he claims are faked - http://s283.photobucket.com/al bums/kk302/kenPphotos" بواسطة Kent Wills
>>>>>>>> No need. Several people, whom YOU deferred to as "experts," already >>>>>>>> outted >>>>>>>> you on the fake boarding pass. And, as I said, I don't give a rat's >>>>>>>> ass >>>>>>>> whether you went to Cuba. I have better things to do with my time.
>>>>>>> Funny NONE of the people claimed to be "EXPERTS" Davey in fact TWO >>>>>>> of >>>>>>>them freely admitted they were NOT.
>>>>>> In your mind that makes a person an expert, as PROVED by your >>>>>> frequently claiming I'm an expert. >>>>>> Either that, or you're so drunk you don't understand when someone >>>>>> informs you that they're not an expert.
>>>>> No, Kunt, you ATILL don't get it. I know that you are not an expert,
>>>> I do get that you are UNABLE to resist your drunken compulsion to >>>> claim I am an expert. I've understood this for a while. >>>> It appears everyone reading also understands. Certainly no one is >>>> willing to offer a counter to the claim. Not even you.
>>>>>neither is your fairy buddy Moore. But you two are terribly strident >>>>>with >>>>>your claims that the photos ARE faked.
>>>> I've made no such claim.
>>> Let's see if we understand each other, now you are admitting they are >>>most likely genuine!
>> As I stated, and you dishonestly snipped, I believe they are fake.
> Okay then PROVE IT!
That I've stated I believe it should stand as proof that I believe it. If I did not, I would have stated I do not believe it. Try posting while sober, Pangborn. Seriously, try it one time.
>You can't have it both ways Kunt. If you believe >they are fake make YOUR CASE or STFU!!!
How do you propose I prove a belief? I can point to that which gives me cause to believe. In fact, I did so in another thread. You even acknowledged the difference in print about a year ago.
"you are reading Moore's SELECTIVE material that is HIGHLY edited." Kenneth Robert Pangborn claiming in misc.legal that David Moore can and does edit Google's Usenet archive. Message-ID: <n9Sfm.1372$nh2....@nwrddc02.gnilink.net>
>>>>>>>>> No need. Several people, whom YOU deferred to as "experts," >>>>>>>>> already >>>>>>>>> outted >>>>>>>>> you on the fake boarding pass. And, as I said, I don't give a >>>>>>>>> rat's >>>>>>>>> ass >>>>>>>>> whether you went to Cuba. I have better things to do with my >>>>>>>>> time.
>>>>>>>> Funny NONE of the people claimed to be "EXPERTS" Davey in fact >>>>>>>> TWO >>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>them freely admitted they were NOT.
>>>>>>> In your mind that makes a person an expert, as PROVED by your >>>>>>> frequently claiming I'm an expert. >>>>>>> Either that, or you're so drunk you don't understand when >>>>>>> someone >>>>>>> informs you that they're not an expert.
>>>>>> No, Kunt, you ATILL don't get it. I know that you are not an >>>>>> expert,
>>>>> I do get that you are UNABLE to resist your drunken compulsion to >>>>> claim I am an expert. I've understood this for a while. >>>>> It appears everyone reading also understands. Certainly no one is >>>>> willing to offer a counter to the claim. Not even you.
>>>>>>neither is your fairy buddy Moore. But you two are terribly strident >>>>>>with >>>>>>your claims that the photos ARE faked.
>>>>> I've made no such claim.
>>>> Let's see if we understand each other, now you are admitting they >>>> are >>>>most likely genuine!
>>> As I stated, and you dishonestly snipped, I believe they are fake.
>> Okay then PROVE IT!
> That I've stated I believe it should stand as proof that I > believe it.
So you are so TOTALLY DELUSIONAL that you think that just because you say something or that you believe something that THAT should stand as PROOF of the FACT of the matter? You are one fukkked up dude, Wills. You are a dumb Polack who isn't playing with a full deck. You make THAT painfully obvious, Wills.
>>>> >> > >>>>>> That you are unable to afford one doesn't make it as bad as >>>> >> > >>>>>> = >> you >>>> >> > >>>>>> claim.
>>>> >LIT> > >>>>>I paid much more for my Kia Rio than the PTs are going for >>>> >around here. >>>> >> > >>>>>Not terribly expensive cars.
>>>> >DDM> > >>>>It was a decent "get you around" car for my wife, for >>>> >miscellaneous errands >>>> >> > >>>>such as shopping, PTA etc. rather than driving a gas-guzzling >>>> >> > >>>>S= >> UV >>>> >> > >>>>around. >>>> >> > >>>>It did seem to blow fuses a little more than normal during its >>>> >> > >>>>lifetime >>>> >> > >>>>though. We'd gotten to the point of outgrowing it anyway, even >>>> >> > >>>>before it >>>> >> > >>>>became scrapyard material.
>>>> >> > >>> I think you missed Betty's point. It's not an expensive >>>> >> > >>> vehicle= >> , and >>>> >> > >>> still it's too pricey for >>>> > > >>> Pangborn.
>>>> >> > >>What of a 2008 Honda CRV bought new?
>>>> >> > > If you can't afford a PT Cruiser, you don't stand a chance of >>>> >> > > get= >> ting >>>> >> > > the CRV. >>>> >> > > If you're going to claim you own one, you'll need to offer >>>> >> > > someth= >> ing >>>> >> > > in the way of proof.
>>>> >> > I bought one NEW in 2008. PROOF? There is NO proof that a RETARD >>>> >> > li= >> ke >>>> >> > YOU would understand. Want the original window sticker off it in a >>>> >> > = >> scan? >>>> >> > A >>>> >> > photo?
>>>> >> The bill of sale and registration paper when you got the vehicle >>>> >> licensed are proof enough Kennie.
>>>> >> THE SCAN OF IT, Maureen?
>>>> >MOE> =A0 =A0Here's what I like to know. You filed for bankruptcy some >>>> >y= >> ears >>>> >MOE> ago, had to sell you old decrepit home for less than you wanted, >>>> >a= >> nd >>>> >MOE> yet you claim you not only own =A0your current SMALL home but you >>>> >= >> have >>>> >MOE> two SUVs and a 2009 Civic?
>>>> > =A0 =A0ONE SUV and ONE Civic. The house isn't that small, the LAND is >>>> > = >> smaller. >>>> >Yes, Maureen, I had to sell it for less than I wanted. Sadly the real >>>> >e= >> state >>>> >market went belly up along with the U.S. economy, which it is said is >>>> >i= >> n the >>>> >worst shape since the depression of the 30's.
>>>> And I'm sure it didn't help that I contacted every real estate agent in >>>> = >> the >>>> Tampa area, letting them know that your house was appraised with >>>> sinkhol= >> e >>>> and termite problems. =A0Because I knew that you might conveniently >>>> forg= >> et to >>>> disclose this to a prospective buyer....
>>>> As a result, you ended up selling for $50,000 less than other >>>> comparable= >> s >>>> were pricing in your area. =A0And all because you lied, and then didn't >>>> = >> have >>>> the integrity to simply apologize. =A0Great move!
>>>> > I wish that someday you could >>>> >come close to getting some facts right. I actually did pretty well in >>>> >t= >> he >>>> >sale of my old house and the purchase of the one I have now. My wife >>>> >an= >> d I >>>> >like it much better. You could say my wife has put down roots here. If >>>> >= >> you >>>> >had even half a brain you'd understand that pun.
>>>> Is that some sort of strip club lingo? =A0Those of us who didn't >>>> purchas= >> e our >>>> wives from some titty bar in Cuba aren't familiar with all the jargon.
>>>> >MOE> =A0Where's the money coming from to afford all this Kennie? >>>> >=A0How= >> many >>>> >trips to and from Cuba HAVE you done?
>>>> > =A0 =A0Afford ALL this? All what? I took the proceeds from the sale >>>> > of= >> the old >>>> >house, and paid for the one we have now plus some serious updating. >>>> >Lik= >> e a >>>> >new kitchen, all new appliances and such. Updating the electrical >>>> >servi= >> ce. >>>> >(Changing from Aluminum wiring to copper ROMEX) adding a half dozen >>>> >new=
>>>> >circuits with new breakers That kind of thing. Lots of GREEN stuff - >>>> >en= >> ergy >>>> >saving, like windows, and even ultra low flow toilets. =A0Other GREEN >>>> >s= >> tuff >>>> >includes planting 5 trees in front, and 5 in back. Not to mention many >>>> >dozens of plants. Both care are ULTRA low emission Hondas. That makes >>>> >o= >> ur >>>> >carbon foot print very small Maureen.
>>>> Too bad you haven't put as much work into making your regular footprint >>>> smaller. =A0Maybe less time on usenet and more time on a treadmill, eh >>>> fatass?
>>>> >What about you? What are YOU doing to >>>> >go GREEN?
>>>> > =A0 =A0Trips to Cuba? My wife went for a month this summer. Should I >>>> > p= >> ut up >>>> >some photos for you? Why are you so concerned about my trips to Cuba, >>>> >Maureen? Remember your BOYFRIEND Moore claims I have never been there.
>>>> I've never claimed anything of the sort. =A0Nor am I her boyfriend, >>>> desp= >> ite >>>> the fact that we share the view that you're a piece of crap. =A0(No >>>> offe= >> nse, >>>> Maureen, but I'm happily married.)
>>>No offense taken. I have a man friend of my own and he satisfies me >>>quite well. Kennie and his butt monkey greg enjoy themselves imagining >>>me to be some sort of loose female. Though how can Kennie claim you >>>are gay while at the same time claim I'm you're girlfriend seems to be >>>a huge contradiction.
>> You're just one of many, according to him. He has claimed that at least >> four other women have accepted my marriage proposal at one time or >> another.
> Amazing how ther can be so many stupid women. But we can see the women >by the hundreds who propose to men on death row every year. All but two of >them found you out before it was too late, Davey.
Actually, your statement about me being engaged to four different women was a lie....a result of your complete inability to dig up ANY accurate information on me.
>> He claims that I have two ex-wives, then claims that a woman from Indiana >> and another from California are or were engaged to me. And now there's >> you. In other words, I must have amazing prowess... definitely doesn't >> fit >> in with the description of someone who is "gay"....
>> But then again, we all know how Ken loves to project....
> As it has been said; "you can fool all of the people some of the time, >you can fool some of the people all of the time, but you CANNOT fool all of >the people all of the time, Davey." So far, lately. women catch your scent >early enough to save themselves,
And yet I've been married to the same woman for well over a decade.
"[I have] [n]ever had [any] standing in the Texas Criminal Defense Lawyer's Association or AN Y connection to them." --Ken Pangborn in a usenet post on January 1, 2009, denying affiliation with the TCDLA, to whom he provided bogus educational credentials. His lie is disproved here: http://web.archive.org/web/20060822021821/www.tcdla.com/secure/expert... x.shtml
"Some photo of some girl without even any documentation on THAT only proves that YOU are a PSYCHO! A really STUPID one at that!" --Ken Pangborn, admitting to being a "stupid" "psycho" in message-ID <jOp3l.292$Es4....@nwrddc01.gnilink.net>
"The FACT is that [my mail-order wife Barbara Sanciprian] and I were introduced in the FORMAL Spanish tradition by mutual friends, and were married first in Cuba after 2 year courtship." --Ken Pangborn, admitting that he began cheating on his wife Peggy on September 28, 2001, nearly two years before she separated from him
"I'm David Moore and I am insane!" --Ken Pangborn posting to alt.dads-rights.unmoderated, attempting to claim that his name is David Moore
"If you call the police, I'll knock out all of your teeth, I'll cripple you. I may go to prison for it, but when I get out, I'll be able to walk, but you will still be a cripple." --Pangborn puppet Greg Hanson of alt.support.child-protective-services **, in a verbal threat to his girlfriend
** - this conclusion was reached via applying Ken and Greg's logic
Keywords: false allegations,sexual abuse,marital rape, date rape, sexual harassment,child abuse,domestic violence,rape allegations,false allegations of child abuse,false rape allegations,false abuse accusations,false accusations,recovered memories,child sexual abuse,abuse child,sexual assault,child molestation,reactive attachment disorder,penile plethysmograph,polygraph,attorneys,divorce,visitation,pedophiles More-keywords: KRP CONSULTING. False allegations of child abuse, false abuse accusations, false domestic violence allegations help, false rape allegations, abuse child, sexual abuse, child sexual abuse, false allegations, false accusations, recovered memories, sexual assault, child molestation, child sexual abuse, reactive attachment disorder, penile plethysmograph, polygraph, trial consulting, jury consulting, jury selection, jury voire dire, wrongful allegations, false child sexual abuse allegations. Wrongful child sexual abuse allegations. Domestic Violence. Rape. Marital rape. Date Rape. Confidence Rape. Yet-more-keywords: ken pangborn,kenneth pangborn,barbara pangborn,barbara sanciprian,palm harbor,tampa,attorneys,florida lawyers,florida attorneys,tampa lawyers,tampa attorneys,trial consultant,trial consulting,dui,domestic violence,vawa,abuse,3648 cockatoo,new port richey,ernesto sanciprian,ernesto miguel blanco sanciprian,blanco sanciprian,bryce carter,holguin,julio aguilar,yudith bacallao,raimundo cabrera,ana hernandez chi,lixandro cordero,leandis diaz,al faisbuker,wendy gil,armando capo ramos,george riveron,reinaldo rodriguez,lexis
يرجى تحديث اسم الشهرة الخاص بك على صفحة إعدادات الاشتراك قبل النشر.
لا يوجد لديك الإذن المطلوب للنشر.
تغير موضوع المناقشة إلى "Wills and the link to the photos he claims are faked - http://s283.photobucket.com/al bums/kk302/kenPphotos" بواسطة Kent Wills
>>>>>>>>>> No need. Several people, whom YOU deferred to as "experts," >>>>>>>>>> already >>>>>>>>>> outted >>>>>>>>>> you on the fake boarding pass. And, as I said, I don't give a >>>>>>>>>> rat's >>>>>>>>>> ass >>>>>>>>>> whether you went to Cuba. I have better things to do with my >>>>>>>>>> time.
>>>>>>>>> Funny NONE of the people claimed to be "EXPERTS" Davey in fact >>>>>>>>> TWO >>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>them freely admitted they were NOT.
>>>>>>>> In your mind that makes a person an expert, as PROVED by your >>>>>>>> frequently claiming I'm an expert. >>>>>>>> Either that, or you're so drunk you don't understand when >>>>>>>> someone >>>>>>>> informs you that they're not an expert.
>>>>>>> No, Kunt, you ATILL don't get it. I know that you are not an >>>>>>> expert,
>>>>>> I do get that you are UNABLE to resist your drunken compulsion to >>>>>> claim I am an expert. I've understood this for a while. >>>>>> It appears everyone reading also understands. Certainly no one is >>>>>> willing to offer a counter to the claim. Not even you.
>>>>>>>neither is your fairy buddy Moore. But you two are terribly strident >>>>>>>with >>>>>>>your claims that the photos ARE faked.
>>>>>> I've made no such claim.
>>>>> Let's see if we understand each other, now you are admitting they >>>>> are >>>>>most likely genuine!
>>>> As I stated, and you dishonestly snipped, I believe they are fake.
>>> Okay then PROVE IT!
>> That I've stated I believe it should stand as proof that I >> believe it.
> So you are so TOTALLY DELUSIONAL that you think that just because you >say something or that you believe something that THAT should stand as PROOF >of the FACT of the matter?
It stands as proof that I believe. I've never claimed anything more.
>You are one fukkked up dude, Wills. You are a >dumb Polack who isn't playing with a full deck. You make THAT painfully >obvious, Wills.
Because I hold a belief? Please elaborate.
"I am insane!" --Kenneth Robert Pangborn, of KRP Consulting and The A-team, posting to alt.dads-rights.unmoderated claiming that he was found legally insane.
On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 17:39:02 -0800 (PST), Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
>I don't think
That is self evident.
>Kent really believes what he says.
Is that why you snipped the whole of the post? Do you fear being exposed, again, for the lying pro-CPS scum you are to such a degree you actually think snipping the whole of the post will make it stop? Greg, why, exactly, do you LOVE the people at CPS so much? Why do you ALWAYS give advice that will ensure the families LOSE against CPS? I'd like very specific reasons, please.
Title: ST VS GREGORY HANSON (DOB 05/22/1959) CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 04/10/1996 Comments: CT 1 OWI 1ST OTHER CITATION 04/10/1996 Comments: CT 2 SPEED Disposition Status GUILTY PLEA/DEFAULT
Me: "I suspect your stalking is due to the use and abuse of illegal drugs, Greg. Is the reason for your stalking the members of alt.friends due to the use and abuse of illegal drugs?
Gregory Scott Hanson, wife beater and child abuser: "Of course."
"My family's case is for Neglect, but we are treated in virtually every regard as child abusers, marked on the Child Abuse registry, for example." -- Greg Scott Hanson telling Usenet he's a FOUNDED child abuser. Message-ID: <35120b16.0401111639.6825febd@posting.google.com>
" ... But there ought to be conferences and studies on how to curb minority overpopulation, repatriate minorities abroad, imprison more minorities, increase use of the death penalty and divest minorities of the power they have usurped over us in recent years. That would address the most pressing problems of our day. ... " April 2000, Gregory Hanson http://www.nationalist.org/ATW/2000/040101.html#Hanson
With the Christmas season upon us again, my stepdaughter was launching into her usual tirade of "I need this" (Nintendo 64 games, Pokemon, videos, Rhianna CD, etc.) After enduring a trip through Kmart, I was at my wits end. I took the kid home and filled the bathtub with water. Then I dunked the brat's head under the water and counted out a full minute, with her flailing her arms. I brought her up and she gasped for air. When she'd caught her breath, I asked her, "When you were under that water, did you 'need' Nintendo? Pokemon? Rhianna?" She shook her head. "What were you thinking about?" I prodded. She told me "I was thinking that I needed air."
"Now you know the difference between 'need' and 'want'" I exclaimed triumphantly.
>>>>> >> > >>>>>> That you are unable to afford one doesn't make it as bad >>>>> >> > >>>>>> as >>>>> >> > >>>>>> = >>> you >>>>> >> > >>>>>> claim.
>>>>> >LIT> > >>>>>I paid much more for my Kia Rio than the PTs are going >>>>> >for >>>>> >around here. >>>>> >> > >>>>>Not terribly expensive cars.
>>>>> >DDM> > >>>>It was a decent "get you around" car for my wife, for >>>>> >miscellaneous errands >>>>> >> > >>>>such as shopping, PTA etc. rather than driving a gas-guzzling >>>>> >> > >>>>S= >>> UV >>>>> >> > >>>>around. >>>>> >> > >>>>It did seem to blow fuses a little more than normal during >>>>> >> > >>>>its >>>>> >> > >>>>lifetime >>>>> >> > >>>>though. We'd gotten to the point of outgrowing it anyway, >>>>> >> > >>>>even >>>>> >> > >>>>before it >>>>> >> > >>>>became scrapyard material.
>>>>> >> > >>> I think you missed Betty's point. It's not an expensive >>>>> >> > >>> vehicle= >>> , and >>>>> >> > >>> still it's too pricey for >>>>> > > >>> Pangborn.
>>>>> >> > >>What of a 2008 Honda CRV bought new?
>>>>> >> > > If you can't afford a PT Cruiser, you don't stand a chance of >>>>> >> > > get= >>> ting >>>>> >> > > the CRV. >>>>> >> > > If you're going to claim you own one, you'll need to offer >>>>> >> > > someth= >>> ing >>>>> >> > > in the way of proof.
>>>>> >> > I bought one NEW in 2008. PROOF? There is NO proof that a RETARD >>>>> >> > li= >>> ke >>>>> >> > YOU would understand. Want the original window sticker off it in >>>>> >> > a >>>>> >> > = >>> scan? >>>>> >> > A >>>>> >> > photo?
>>>>> >> The bill of sale and registration paper when you got the vehicle >>>>> >> licensed are proof enough Kennie.
>>>>> >> THE SCAN OF IT, Maureen?
>>>>> >MOE> =A0 =A0Here's what I like to know. You filed for bankruptcy some >>>>> >y= >>> ears >>>>> >MOE> ago, had to sell you old decrepit home for less than you wanted, >>>>> >a= >>> nd >>>>> >MOE> yet you claim you not only own =A0your current SMALL home but >>>>> >you >>>>> >= >>> have >>>>> >MOE> two SUVs and a 2009 Civic?
>>>>> > =A0 =A0ONE SUV and ONE Civic. The house isn't that small, the LAND >>>>> > is >>>>> > = >>> smaller. >>>>> >Yes, Maureen, I had to sell it for less than I wanted. Sadly the real >>>>> >e= >>> state >>>>> >market went belly up along with the U.S. economy, which it is said is >>>>> >i= >>> n the >>>>> >worst shape since the depression of the 30's.
>>>>> And I'm sure it didn't help that I contacted every real estate agent >>>>> in >>>>> = >>> the >>>>> Tampa area, letting them know that your house was appraised with >>>>> sinkhol= >>> e >>>>> and termite problems. =A0Because I knew that you might conveniently >>>>> forg= >>> et to >>>>> disclose this to a prospective buyer....
>>>>> As a result, you ended up selling for $50,000 less than other >>>>> comparable= >>> s >>>>> were pricing in your area. =A0And all because you lied, and then >>>>> didn't >>>>> = >>> have >>>>> the integrity to simply apologize. =A0Great move!
>>>>> > I wish that someday you could >>>>> >come close to getting some facts right. I actually did pretty well in >>>>> >t= >>> he >>>>> >sale of my old house and the purchase of the one I have now. My wife >>>>> >an= >>> d I >>>>> >like it much better. You could say my wife has put down roots here. >>>>> >If >>>>> >= >>> you >>>>> >had even half a brain you'd understand that pun.
>>>>> Is that some sort of strip club lingo? =A0Those of us who didn't >>>>> purchas= >>> e our >>>>> wives from some titty bar in Cuba aren't familiar with all the jargon.
>>>>> >MOE> =A0Where's the money coming from to afford all this Kennie? >>>>> >=A0How= >>> many >>>>> >trips to and from Cuba HAVE you done?
>>>>> > =A0 =A0Afford ALL this? All what? I took the proceeds from the sale >>>>> > of= >>> the old >>>>> >house, and paid for the one we have now plus some serious updating. >>>>> >Lik= >>> e a >>>>> >new kitchen, all new appliances and such. Updating the electrical >>>>> >servi= >>> ce. >>>>> >(Changing from Aluminum wiring to copper ROMEX) adding a half dozen >>>>> >new=
>>>>> >circuits with new breakers That kind of thing. Lots of GREEN stuff - >>>>> >en= >>> ergy >>>>> >saving, like windows, and even ultra low flow toilets. =A0Other GREEN >>>>> >s= >>> tuff >>>>> >includes planting 5 trees in front, and 5 in back. Not to mention >>>>> >many >>>>> >dozens of plants. Both care are ULTRA low emission Hondas. That makes >>>>> >o= >>> ur >>>>> >carbon foot print very small Maureen.
>>>>> Too bad you haven't put as much work into making your regular >>>>> footprint >>>>> smaller. =A0Maybe less time on usenet and more time on a treadmill, eh >>>>> fatass?
>>>>> >What about you? What are YOU doing to >>>>> >go GREEN?
>>>>> > =A0 =A0Trips to Cuba? My wife went for a month this summer. Should I >>>>> > p= >>> ut up >>>>> >some photos for you? Why are you so concerned about my trips to Cuba, >>>>> >Maureen? Remember your BOYFRIEND Moore claims I have never been >>>>> >there.
>>>>> I've never claimed anything of the sort. =A0Nor am I her boyfriend, >>>>> desp= >>> ite >>>>> the fact that we share the view that you're a piece of crap. =A0(No >>>>> offe= >>> nse, >>>>> Maureen, but I'm happily married.)
>>>>No offense taken. I have a man friend of my own and he satisfies me >>>>quite well. Kennie and his butt monkey greg enjoy themselves imagining >>>>me to be some sort of loose female. Though how can Kennie claim you >>>>are gay while at the same time claim I'm you're girlfriend seems to be >>>>a huge contradiction.
>>> You're just one of many, according to him. He has claimed that at least >>> four other women have accepted my marriage proposal at one time or >>> another.
>> Amazing how ther can be so many stupid women. But we can see the women >>by the hundreds who propose to men on death row every year. All but two of >>them found you out before it was too late, Davey. > Actually, your statement about me being engaged to four different women > was > a lie....a result of your complete inability to dig up ANY accurate > information on me.
I've gotten loads of info on you, Moore, you'd be surprised to know how many people you know have been a constant flow of information. Some you think are really on your side, and I am not referring to the ones YOU create. Although, Davey, even those contain information about you you don't intend for me to pick up on.
>>> He claims that I have two ex-wives, then claims that a woman from >>> Indiana >>> and another from California are or were engaged to me. And now there's >>> you. In other words, I must have amazing prowess... definitely doesn't >>> fit >>> in with the description of someone who is "gay"....
>>> But then again, we all know how Ken loves to project....
>> As it has been said; "you can fool all of the people some of the time, >>you can fool some of the people all of the time, but you CANNOT fool all >>of >>the people all of the time, Davey." So far, lately. women catch your scent >>early enough to save themselves, > And yet I've been married to the same woman for well over a decade.
BULLSHIT! I've seen the divorce paperwork from Missouri - DEADBEAT!
>>>>>>>>>>> outted you on the fake boarding pass. And, as I said, I don't >>>>>>>>>>> give a >>>>>>>>>>> rat's ass wether you went to Cuba. I have better things to do >>>>>>>>>>> with my >>>>>>>>>>> time.
>>>>>>>>>> Funny NONE of the people claimed to be "EXPERTS" Davey in fact >>>>>>>>>> TWO >>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>them freely admitted they were NOT.
>>>>>>>>> In your mind that makes a person an expert, as PROVED by your >>>>>>>>> frequently claiming I'm an expert. >>>>>>>>> Either that, or you're so drunk you don't understand when >>>>>>>>> someone >>>>>>>>> informs you that they're not an expert.
>>>>>>>> No, Kunt, you ATILL don't get it. I know that you are not an >>>>>>>> expert,
>>>>>>> I do get that you are UNABLE to resist your drunken compulsion to >>>>>>> claim I am an expert. I've understood this for a while. >>>>>>> It appears everyone reading also understands. Certainly no one >>>>>>> is >>>>>>> willing to offer a counter to the claim. Not even you.
>>>>>>>>neither is your fairy buddy Moore. But you two are terribly strident >>>>>>>>with >>>>>>>>your claims that the photos ARE faked.
>>>>>>> I've made no such claim.
>>>>>> Let's see if we understand each other, now you are admitting they >>>>>> are >>>>>>most likely genuine!
>>>>> As I stated, and you dishonestly snipped, I believe they are fake.
>>>> Okay then PROVE IT!
>>> That I've stated I believe it should stand as proof that I >>> believe it.
>> So you are so TOTALLY DELUSIONAL that you think that just because you >>say something or that you believe something that THAT should stand as >>PROOF >>of the FACT of the matter? > It stands as proof that I believe. I've never claimed anything more.
What is the basis for this STRIDENT BELIEF? What do you ***THINK*** you see in the photos that you ***THINK*** supports your STRIDENT BELIEF that they are FAKES?
>>You are one fukkked up dude, Wills. You are a >>dumb Polack who isn't playing with a full deck. You make THAT painfully >>obvious, Wills. > Because I hold a belief? Please elaborate.
Because you believe that your drunken belief is PROOF of the ultimate FACT! That because you SAY something that it is binding of the conclusive FACT on the rest of the universe. THAT is why you are a fukkkking NUT CASE, Wills. Either you know them to be a fake or you do not, if you DO - show us your evidence, if you don't STFU!!!!! Got it Polack?
Greg, he just DEMANDS that everyone else BELIEVES what he claims. Note for the record he will NOT come close to justifying his claims nor will he stop making the claim that the photos are FAKED!
> >>>I don't think Kent really believes what he says.
> >> Greg, he just DEMANDS that everyone else BELIEVES what he claims. Note > >> for the record he will NOT come close to justifying his claims
> > Like you claiming on your websites that you have two "Cum laude" college > > degrees, pangborn?
DJS3 > Of course you could justify the claim by DJS3 > posting the names of the colleges DJS3 > where you supposedly earned those DJS3 > "Cum Laude" degrees.
>>>I don't think Kent really believes what he says.
>> Greg, he just DEMANDS that everyone else BELIEVES what he claims. Note >> for the record he will NOT come close to justifying his claims > Like you claiming on your websites that you have two "Cum laude" college > degrees, pangborn?
Like Kunt Wills, Danny you remain INACCURATE; IT SAYS:
"Mr. Pangborn has a BA degree in Child Development (Cum Laude) and a Master of Science Degree in Psychology".
> >>>I don't think Kent really believes what he says.
> >> Greg, he just DEMANDS that everyone else BELIEVES what he claims. Note > >> for the record he will NOT come close to justifying his claims
> > Like you claiming on your websites that you have two "Cum laude" college > > degrees, pangborn?
DJS3 > Of course you could justify the claim by DJS3 > posting the names of the colleges DJS3 > where you supposedly earned those DJS3 > "Cum Laude" degrees.
GH> You first, Dan! Tell us where you matriculated, Dan!
East Brooklyn Lavatory U. is my bet where DANNY got HIS degrees. Ph.D. in Bullshitology.
DJS3 > Of course you could justify the claim by DJS3 > posting the names of the colleges DJS3 > where you supposedly earned those DJS3 > "Cum Laude" degrees.
G > You first, Dan! Tell us where you matriculated, Dan!
KRP > East Brooklyn Lavatory U. is my bet where DANNY KRP > got HIS degrees. Ph.D. in Bullshitology.
>> Nobody from Calumet City Illinois wrote the message you're replying to.
> Just YOU little Davey! JUST YOU!
Except the David Moore from Calumet City isn't the same one we know. This has been proved.
>>>> You're just one of many, according to him. He has claimed that at least >>>> four other women have accepted my marriage proposal at one time or >>>> another.
>>> Amazing how ther can be so many stupid women. But we can see the women >>>by the hundreds who propose to men on death row every year. All but two of >>>them found you out before it was too late, Davey.
>> Actually, your statement about me being engaged to four different women >> was >> a lie....a result of your complete inability to dig up ANY accurate >> information on me.
> I've gotten loads of info on you, Moore,
To date, none of it, aside from his first and last name, has been accurate. I happen to KNOW the pictures you have are not of the David Moore we know, if they are of anyone named David Moore at all.
>you'd be surprised to know how >many people you know have been a constant flow of information.
None? That's my guess.
>Some you >think are really on your side, and I am not referring to the ones YOU >create. Although, Davey, even those contain information about you you don't >intend for me to pick up on.
When has David ever posted while not making certain everyone is aware it's him?
[...]
>>>> in with the description of someone who is "gay"....
>>>> But then again, we all know how Ken loves to project....
>>> As it has been said; "you can fool all of the people some of the time, >>>you can fool some of the people all of the time, but you CANNOT fool all >>>of >>>the people all of the time, Davey." So far, lately. women catch your scent >>>early enough to save themselves,
>> And yet I've been married to the same woman for well over a decade.
> BULLSHIT! I've seen the divorce paperwork from Missouri - DEADBEAT!
I don't know how long David and his wife have been married (I've never had cause to check their marriage license), but given the age of their oldest child, a decade or more is certainly plausible.
"you are reading Moore's SELECTIVE material that is HIGHLY edited." Kenneth Robert Pangborn claiming in misc.legal that David Moore can and does edit Google's Usenet archive. Message-ID: <n9Sfm.1372$nh2....@nwrddc02.gnilink.net>
|
