Draw and quarter the school management and skin that god damned, cocksucking teacher ALIVE. Better yet, give me 1 minute with the piece of shit--I will dump their remains out of a MaDonalds coffee cup into the closest port-a-shitter available.
<igor_the_terri...@mad.scientist.com> wrote: > Here is another product of religious crazies.
> Solution:
> Draw and quarter the school management and skin that god damned, > cocksucking teacher ALIVE. Better yet, give me 1 minute with the > piece of shit--I will dump their remains out of a MaDonalds coffee cup > into the closest port-a-shitter available.
<igor_the_terri...@mad.scientist.com> wrote: > Here is another product of religious crazies.
> Solution:
> Draw and quarter the school management and skin that god damned, > cocksucking teacher ALIVE. Better yet, give me 1 minute with the > piece of shit--I will dump their remains out of a MaDonalds coffee cup > into the closest port-a-shitter available.
Call it what you will, but the Fort Hood bloodbath is the first major Islam- inspired suicide attack in the "homeland" since 9/11.
Look for more, of various kinds, planning for which has probably been underway for months if not years. Can you picture 30 or so people killed on a New York City street by a suicide bomber?
It's why, for rational security reasons -- every U.S. adult resident with a Muslim surname, especially those directly involved with the military, firearms sales and associations, explosive components inquiries, and those in communication with Islamic groups here and abroad -- ALL should be under watch and monitoring by our CIA and FBI.
Even though those federal agencies under Bush dismally failed us in the 9/11 disaster.
Remember, everything changed on 9/11, especially trust in and tolerance of Muslims of every stripe.
The U.S. is at war all right, and ultimately they're both about RELIGION.
On Nov 6, 10:12 am, "God'sLittleAnus" <perryneh...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Call it what you will, but the Fort Hood bloodbath is the first major > Islam- > inspired suicide attack in the "homeland" since 9/11.
13 is not comparable to 3000.
> Look for more, of various kinds, planning for which has probably been > underway for months if not years. Can you picture 30 or so people > killed on a New York City street by a suicide bomber?
No. Because it hasn't happened.
> It's why, for rational security reasons -- every U.S. adult resident > with a Muslim surname, especially those directly involved with the > military, firearms sales and associations, explosive components > inquiries, and those in communication with Islamic groups here and > abroad -- ALL should be under watch and monitoring by our CIA and FBI.
No. It's why the NWO criminals shouldn't be allowed to flood the country with any foreigners at all.
> Even though those federal agencies under Bush dismally failed us in > the 9/11 disaster.
The ones that weren't in on it, you mean.
> Remember, everything changed on 9/11, especially trust in and > tolerance of Muslims of every stripe.
Yep everything changed on 911.. that's when we found out just how evil the NWO is.
> The U.S. is at war all right, and ultimately they're both about > RELIGION.
No. It's not about religion... it's about NWO apparatchiks conning people into thinking that religions are the enemy.
> Who's your enemy, Baby?
Evil mofos who hide their plutocratic globalist agenda by killing their fellow citizens.
On Nov 6, 1:12 pm, "God'sLittleAnus" <perryneh...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Call it what you will, but the Fort Hood bloodbath is the first major > Islam- > inspired suicide attack in the "homeland" since 9/11.
> Look for more, of various kinds, planning for which has probably been > underway for months if not years. Can you picture 30 or so people > killed on a New York City street by a suicide bomber?
> It's why, for rational security reasons -- every U.S. adult resident > with a Muslim surname, especially those directly involved with the > military, firearms sales and associations, explosive components > inquiries, and those in communication with Islamic groups here and > abroad -- ALL should be under watch and monitoring by our CIA and FBI.
Criminal scumbags both the CIA and FBI. You are a peice of shit that deserves to be destroyed. I hope they get your cocksucking ass.
> Even though those federal agencies under Bush dismally failed us in > the 9/11 disaster.
> Remember, everything changed on 9/11, especially trust in and > tolerance of Muslims of every stripe.
Fuck you ass hole
> The U.S. is at war all right, and ultimately they're both about > RELIGION.
> Who's your enemy, Baby?
You are my enemy you capitalist piece of scum bag shit.
> <igor_the_terri...@mad.scientist.com> wrote: > > Here is another product of religious crazies.
> > Solution:
> > Draw and quarter the school management and skin that god damned, > > cocksucking teacher ALIVE. Better yet, give me 1 minute with the > > piece of shit--I will dump their remains out of a MaDonalds coffee cup > > into the closest port-a-shitter available.
> On Nov 6, 6:32 am, lorad <lorad...@cs.com> wrote:
> > On Nov 5, 11:52 pm, Igor The Terrible
> > <igor_the_terri...@mad.scientist.com> wrote: > > > Here is another product of religious crazies.
> > > Solution:
> > > Draw and quarter the school management and skin that god damned, > > > cocksucking teacher ALIVE. Better yet, give me 1 minute with the > > > piece of shit--I will dump their remains out of a MaDonalds coffee cup > > > into the closest port-a-shitter available.
the russians went through the same thing when they ran the soviet union. moslems would kill their solders all the time with shootings,grenade attacks,etc..they had to eventally purge al the moslems out of their military. you wonder how many of our GI's have been killed in iraq and afghanistan by our own moslem soldiers ?
communists have killed over 100 million people world wide...i think you had better worry about them instead of some one preaching to "hate the sin but love the sinner"..
> communists have killed over 100 million people world wide...i think you > had better worry about them instead of some one preaching to "hate the > sin but love the sinner"..
> JUST SAY NO TO "OBAMMUNISM "
I don't know from where you got your numbers, but a lot more people for a lot longer period of time have been killed in the name of religion.
Lubow wrote: > On Nov 7, 7:16 pm, com...@webtv.net wrote: >> communists have killed over 100 million people world wide...i think you >> had better worry about them instead of some one preaching to "hate the >> sin but love the sinner"..
>> JUST SAY NO TO "OBAMMUNISM "
> I don't know from where you got your numbers, but a lot more people > for a lot longer period of time have been killed in the name of > religion.
"I don't care how many people I have to kill in order to get peace" -Judge Roy Bean
lubow qoutes his communist masters who came up with the term"religons has killed more..." a total lie.nothing compares to he mass slaughter the communists have done around the world and contiue to do..
> lubow qoutes his communist masters who came up with the term"religons > has killed more..." a total lie.nothing compares to he mass slaughter > the communists have done around the world and contiue to do..
> JUST SAY NO TO "OBAMMUNISM "
Your comments, Mr. Comics would be considered libelous if I lived in Campbell CA. In fact they are rather libelous no matter where one lives.
But since those comments are coming from bona-fide idiot, I'm looking the other way for the time being.
However, one more pile of libelous bullshit from your stupid little brain is going to get you into trouble. Unlike Reid the idiot, I'm not going to screw-around with jurisdictional issues because I shall take it directly to the St. Joseph County judiciary. A two day's drive on I80 does not mean that much to me.
If you want to blame anyone, blame Reid. He made me an expert in this crap.
> > lubow qoutes his communist masters who came up with the term"religons > > has killed more..." a total lie.nothing compares to he mass slaughter > > the communists have done around the world and contiue to do..
> > JUST SAY NO TO "OBAMMUNISM "
> Your comments, Mr. Comics would be considered libelous if I lived in > Campbell CA. In fact they are rather libelous no matter where one > lives.
> But since those comments are coming from bona-fide idiot, I'm looking > the other way for the time being.
> However, one more pile of libelous bullshit from your stupid little > brain is going to get you into trouble. Unlike Reid the idiot, I'm > not going to screw-around with jurisdictional issues because I shall > take it directly to the St. Joseph County judiciary. A two day's > drive on I80 does not mean that much to me.
> If you want to blame anyone, blame Reid. He made me an expert in this > crap.
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
Another addition to the bulging file of "you can't make up stuff this hilariously stupid" posts by sick pathetic old man Tenenbaum...
In any event, you're BOTH idiots, since "communism" is just another "religion"...it's a belief system based on imaginary principles of the universe, and as I've always said, people are the most deadly dedicated when defending beliefs that have the least basis in reality.
As a matter of fact, "communism" is just like "capitalism" in those regards...
--- William Ernest Reid Post count: about the same as the times I've been amazed and amused at the sheer lying pathetic idiocy of old man Tenenbaum
On Nov 8, 12:05 pm, Bill Reid <hormelf...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In any event, you're BOTH idiots,
Oh, and I suppose Billy the Brain Reid is the picture of sanity!
> BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
Bill, get over it. You're a loser. You are not the internet's Perry Mason as you have claimed. You are the internet's George Costanza. You are to the internet what Karl von Hess was to pro wrestling. Von Hess looked tough but he was always beaten by a smarter and better looking good guy.
I beat you in your hometown court presided over by a judge your neighbors elected. Instead of honoring your promise to leave the newsgroup, you come back as a bigger jerk than you have ever been.
Bill, you are like a punch drunk fighter who has no idea that he has been beaten to ssmithereens to the point where you are a living embarrassment to everyone around you.
> <igor_the_terri...@mad.scientist.com> wrote: > > Here is another product of religious crazies.
> > Solution:
> > Draw and quarter the school management and skin that god damned, > > cocksucking teacher ALIVE. Better yet, give me 1 minute with the > > piece of shit--I will dump their remains out of a McDonalds coffee cup > > into the closest port-a-shitter available.
> What does religion have to do with your hate problem?
> Believing in a God is far preferable to believing in a Mao, Lenin, > Stalin, Bush or Obama.
I don't have an "unprovoked" hate problem, but, when innocent kids die because of some over zealous clown of their god thinks he is doing him a good service, that doesn't set well with me--at all.
What does God have to do with religion? Religion is a human institution. One's faith in 'a' God is something purely on an individual level--between him and his maker. Religion is a system, an affiliation, an organization concocted by man where like minded people worship a god they know little about based on what they "interpret" from sacred writings. Something potentially dangerous. Hence, in numbers, they form a power base that crosses over into personal and political life that impacts anyone exposed to them in on form or another.
Think about it; what are we at war with at this moment? A religion or government? Look up the word theocracy.
<igor_the_terri...@mad.scientist.com> wrote: > On Nov 6, 9:32 am, lorad <lorad...@cs.com> wrote:
> > On Nov 5, 11:52 pm, Igor The Terrible
> > <igor_the_terri...@mad.scientist.com> wrote: > > > Here is another product of religious crazies.
> > > Solution:
> > > Draw and quarter the school management and skin that god damned, > > > cocksucking teacher ALIVE. Better yet, give me 1 minute with the > > > piece of shit--I will dump their remains out of a McDonalds coffee cup > > > into the closest port-a-shitter available.
> > What does religion have to do with your hate problem?
> > Believing in a God is far preferable to believing in a Mao, Lenin, > > Stalin, Bush or Obama.
> I don't have an "unprovoked" hate problem, but, when innocent kids die > because of some over zealous clown of their god thinks he is doing > him a good service, that doesn't set well with me--at all.
> What does God have to do with religion? Religion is a human > institution. One's faith in 'a' God is something purely on an > individual level--between him and his maker. Religion is a system, an > affiliation, an organization concocted by man where like minded people > worship a god they know little about based on what they "interpret" > from sacred writings. Something potentially dangerous. Hence, in > numbers, they form a power base that crosses over into personal and > political life that impacts anyone exposed to them in on form or > another.
> Think about it; what are we at war with at this moment? A religion or > government? Look up the word theocracy.- Hide quoted text -
> - Show quoted text -
Religion has gotten in the way of understanding a god, if there is one that is.
Lawyerkill wrote: > On Nov 14, 5:06 am, Igor The Terrible > <igor_the_terri...@mad.scientist.com> wrote: >> On Nov 6, 9:32 am, lorad <lorad...@cs.com> wrote:
>>> On Nov 5, 11:52 pm, Igor The Terrible >>> <igor_the_terri...@mad.scientist.com> wrote: >>>> Here is another product of religious crazies. >>>> Solution: >>>> Draw and quarter the school management and skin that god damned, >>>> cocksucking teacher ALIVE. Better yet, give me 1 minute with the >>>> piece of shit--I will dump their remains out of a McDonalds coffee cup >>>> into the closest port-a-shitter available. >>>> It's enough to make you want to puke. >>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uvJ05hHInXk >>> What does religion have to do with your hate problem? >>> Believing in a God is far preferable to believing in a Mao, Lenin, >>> Stalin, Bush or Obama. >> I don't have an "unprovoked" hate problem, but, when innocent kids die >> because of some over zealous clown of their god thinks he is doing >> him a good service, that doesn't set well with me--at all.
>> What does God have to do with religion? Religion is a human >> institution. One's faith in 'a' God is something purely on an >> individual level--between him and his maker. Religion is a system, an >> affiliation, an organization concocted by man where like minded people >> worship a god they know little about based on what they "interpret" >> from sacred writings. Something potentially dangerous. Hence, in >> numbers, they form a power base that crosses over into personal and >> political life that impacts anyone exposed to them in on form or >> another.
>> Think about it; what are we at war with at this moment? A religion or >> government? Look up the word theocracy.- Hide quoted text -
>> - Show quoted text -
> Religion has gotten in the way of understanding a god, if there is one > that is.
Possible so.
However, these anti-God zealots need to give some serious though to the possibility that the only thing worse (in their minds) than a world with God would be one without Him.
Heck, can you imagine everyone in the world making up their own moral code as they go along? We'd devolve into a world full of sociopaths in a generation, I'd wager.
> > Religion has gotten in the way of understanding a god, if there is one > > that is.
> Possible so.
> However, these anti-God zealots need to give some serious though to the > possibility that the only thing worse (in their minds) than a world with > God would be one without Him.
> Heck, can you imagine everyone in the world making up their own moral > code as they go along? We'd devolve into a world full of sociopaths in a > generation, I'd wager.
> - Show quoted text -
After spending the better part of 20 years studying the bible and the mythology of the times it was written in. And having debated some so called bible scholars in another group for many years I reject most of the bible. I say, 'most' because I also find some great wisdom in it, Ecclesiastes Chapter 3 has given me great comfort in times of heartache. I stopped debating because I was starting to find joy in using their own scholars against them, it became an ego trip rather than a search for truth.
Anyway, they can't even agree what books should be in the bible. Pseudepigrapha text are another problem for them, Justin was clearly quoting from gospels that we don't even have anymore.
Just finished reading a few interesting books, "The Evolution of God" by Robert Wright I see it as a laymans verison of Frank Moore Cross's, "Canaanite myth and Hebrew Epic." Another interesting one that also just came out is, "Doubting Jesus Resurrection" by Kris D. Komarnitsky.
Having said that let me say I don't fully buy into the evolution theory, that's not to say that some forms of evolution had not happen, but for me there are too many unanswered questions.
I also don't believe in the theory that's there's a designer that designed everything down to the very smallest detail, but maybe a designed that set up certain rules and let thing develope from there. And evolution does account for how life began, they don't have a real theory for that yet, and maybe never will. They still can't account for how the big bang started, what set it off. They can't really account for love, friendship, morals, or even sex.
I love these PBS show where they always talk about nature doing certain things in evolution, they always give evolution a purpose and a goal, why would something random have a goal? I love it when they talk about an animal wanting sex because it has a big desire to pass on its genes, WTF is that all about? Does the animal take pictures of his kids and show them to other animals? How did this desire evolve? Yo, bud, asking any teenager if he main aim in getting laid is to pass on his genes.
Both sides of this have the first cause problem, neither side can answer it with evidence, so that's another problem.
Right now I have about 4 open books on my bed dealing with the problem of consciousness and let me tell you, they don't have a clue of how it comes about, let alone how it could evolve.
Another thing, they want you to believe in the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics, and all the way out stuff with that, but a god, ahh, that's crazy, mmmm.
I lean toward a creator right now, that's not to say I believe in a creator that has interactions with us, or even cares about us, I have not gotten that far. I see it no more wacked out than QM.
Lawyerkill wrote: > On Nov 14, 8:45 am, John Galt <kady...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Lawyerkill wrote:
>>> Religion has gotten in the way of understanding a god, if there is one >>> that is. >> Possible so.
>> However, these anti-God zealots need to give some serious though to the >> possibility that the only thing worse (in their minds) than a world with >> God would be one without Him.
>> Heck, can you imagine everyone in the world making up their own moral >> code as they go along? We'd devolve into a world full of sociopaths in a >> generation, I'd wager.
>> - Show quoted text -
> After spending the better part of 20 years studying the bible and the > mythology of the times it was written in. And having debated some so > called bible scholars in another group for many years I reject most of > the bible. I say, 'most' because I also find some great wisdom in it, > Ecclesiastes Chapter 3 has given me great comfort in times of > heartache. I stopped debating because I was starting to find joy in > using their own scholars against them, it became an ego trip rather > than a search for truth.
> Anyway, they can't even agree what books should be in the bible. > Pseudepigrapha text are another problem for them, Justin was clearly > quoting from gospels that we don't even have anymore.
> Just finished reading a few interesting books, "The Evolution of God" > by Robert Wright I see it as a laymans verison of Frank Moore Cross's, > "Canaanite myth and Hebrew Epic." Another interesting one that also > just came out is, "Doubting Jesus Resurrection" by Kris D. > Komarnitsky.
Here's one I want to read that takes the other side of that trade, sort of. What it does is debunk the rabid atheist's claims that science has (or will) disprove the existence of a Creator. I heard the author interviewed on the radio the other day:
> Having said that let me say I don't fully buy into the evolution > theory, that's not to say that some forms of evolution had not happen, > but for me there are too many unanswered questions.
I concur (and I say that with a BA in Biology).
> I also don't believe in the theory that's there's a designer that > designed everything down to the very smallest detail, but maybe a > designed that set up certain rules and let thing develope from there. > And evolution does account for how life began, they don't have a real > theory for that yet, and maybe never will. They still can't account > for how the big bang started, what set it off. They can't really > account for love, friendship, morals, or even sex.
Dr. Francis Collins wrote that the biggest terror atheists have is that when they've finally figured out how to model the biggest scientific problem of all time (the first few milliseconds after the big bang) they'll look into their model and see a bunch of theologians who have been there all along. :-)
> I love these PBS show where they always talk about nature doing > certain things in evolution, they always give evolution a purpose and > a goal, why would something random have a goal? I love it when they > talk about an animal wanting sex because it has a big desire to pass > on its genes, WTF is that all about? Does the animal take pictures of > his kids and show them to other animals? How did this desire evolve? > Yo, bud, asking any teenager if he main aim in getting laid is to pass > on his genes.
> Both sides of this have the first cause problem, neither side can > answer it with evidence, so that's another problem.
Precisely. Or, as the CS Lewis used to put it, "Science and Theology are designed to answer two completely different sets of problems."
> Right now I have about 4 open books on my bed dealing with the problem > of consciousness and let me tell you, they don't have a clue of how it > comes about, let alone how it could evolve.
> Another thing, they want you to believe in the Copenhagen > interpretation of quantum mechanics, and all the way out stuff with > that, but a god, ahh, that's crazy, mmmm.
I believe that topic is what much of the first book I cited above deals with -- the intellectual vaccousness of the "Well, science hasn't proved that there's no God yet, but it will someday" mantra.
> I lean toward a creator right now, that's not to say I believe in a > creator that has interactions with us, or even cares about us, I have > not gotten that far. I see it no more wacked out than QM.
Quite so. There are numerous theories bandied about that require a lot more faith than does a virgin birth. :-)
On Nov 14, 5:45 am, John Galt <kady...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Heck, can you imagine everyone in the world making up their own moral > code as they go along?
Why, yes I can, because I read THIS cesspool of hypocritical double-thinking opportunism...
> We'd devolve into a world full of sociopaths in a > generation, I'd wager.
It took less than 10 years for every criminal and creep to BELIEVE the Internet was the place you could "get away with it" (the "Tenenbaum code" of behavior), but note that this is an issue of enforcement on CERTAIN individuals of laws developed by man, not an issue of religion controlling the behavior of ALL people...you don't need "god" to be "good"...
--- William Ernest Reid Post count: less than all the $billions stolen by identity thieves like the creeps that post here
On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 06:54:08 -0800 (PST), Lawyerkill
<Lawyerk...@aol.com> wrote: >I lean toward a creator right now, that's not to say I believe in a >creator that has interactions with us, or even cares about us, I have >not gotten that far. I see it no more wacked out than QM.
But do you believe "organized" religion should be destroyed?
On Nov 14, 6:54 am, Lawyerkill <Lawyerk...@aol.com> wrote:
> After spending the better part of 20 years studying the bible
Man, do you like to waste time...
> And evolution does account for how life began, they don't have a real > theory for that yet, and maybe never will. They still can't account > for how the big bang started, what set it off. They can't really > account for love, friendship, morals, or even sex.
> I love these PBS show where they always talk about nature doing > certain things in evolution, they always give evolution a purpose and > a goal, why would something random have a goal?
Yeah, particularly since a lot of the "goals" seem to be random. For example, think about all the crazy and inexplicable breeding behaviors of various animals, like sea turtles swimming thousands of miles to return to a certain beach or salmon swimming back up a certain creek to reproduce. What's so friggin' important about THAT particular beach or creek for the "survival of the fittest"? Especially since in many cases, this monomania for the specific breeding ground actually PREVENTS the animal from breeding, as geologic or man-made changes have destroyed it...
But there it is, the incredibly complicated behavior that can't be explained and makes no sense, but of course it must have been developed to ensure the survival of the species according to Darwin.
My favorite example of this type of idiotic thinking was when Okrah Wimpy had a special "men's show" where men could get answers to their medical questions from Dr. Oooze, another annoying and moronic protege of hers who is to medicine what Dr. Phull is to psychology.
So this audience member gets up and asks the question that everybody knew was coming. He says that he's a little small in the pants, and wondered if there was a legitimate "cure" for his condition.
Now at this point all other phoney-baloney medical advisers would blather out some platitude that penis size doesn't matter, yadda yadda yadda. But not Dr. Ooooze, who is so zonked out on his own stupid self-importance that he started going off on a tangent as to why human males have such large schlongs compared to other simians.
He actually says that the ONLY reasons human males are so "big" is that "women like it that way", that's why men "evolved" this way. Of course, Mr. NeedleDick is crushed, but aside from that, my question is naturally: WHY THE HELL WOULD WOMEN "EVOLVE" TO LIKE OVERLY LARGE LOVE-RODS? I mean, what's the point, how did they know a guy was a grower not a shower, were there millions of years of ape-women shutting down ape-men with subsized bananas, is Tommy Lee the zenith of human evolution?
Basically, looking at all these "facts", I have to conclude that "god" does exist, and "his" motivation in "his" design of the world is to provide lots of material to comedians who like to work "dirty", since it DOES appear that the entire world is just one dumb meaningless filthy joke...
--- William Ernest Reid Post count: just a little more than the combined number of pornos and "Leave It To Beaver" episodes with John Holmes
On Nov 14, 3:20 pm, Ricky Jimenez <ricky...@bestweb.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 06:54:08 -0800 (PST), Lawyerkill
> <Lawyerk...@aol.com> wrote: > >I lean toward a creator right now, that's not to say I believe in a > >creator that has interactions with us, or even cares about us, I have > >not gotten that far. I see it no more wacked out than QM.
> But do you believe "organized" religion should be destroyed?
|
