الصفحة الرئيسية لمجموعات Google
تعليمات | تسجيل الدخول
OT7 Solo NOTs leaked apparently
هناك حالياً عدة مواضيع في هذه المجموعة يتم عرضها كأول موضوع. لجعل هذا الموضوع يظهر كأول موضوع، الرجاء إزالة هذا الخيار من المواضيع اﻷخرى.
وقع خطأ في معالجة طلبك. الرجاء حاول مجددا.
تمييز
  4‏ من الرسائل - طي الكل
المجموعة التي تقوم بالإرسال إليها هيمجموعة Usenet. الرسائل المرسلة لهذه المجموعة ستجعل بريدك مرئيًا لأي فرد على شبكة الإنترنت
لم يتم إرسال رسالة الرد حتى الآن.
تم النشر الخاص بك بنجاح
jupu...@gmail.com  
عرض ملف التعريف
‏ (1 عضو)  خيارات أكثر 6 أكتوبر, 03:50
مجموعات أخبار: alt.religion.scientology
من: jupu...@gmail.com
التاريخ: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 18:50:20 -0700 (PDT)
محلّي: ‏الاثنين 6 أكتوبر 2008 03:50‏
الموضوع: ‏OT7 Solo NOTs leaked apparently‏
Various documents have been leaked on several sites purporting to be
the HCO Solo NOTs.  Can anyone shed any light on their authenticy?
From whyweprotest.net: http://forums.whyweprotest.net/123-leaks-legal/previous-ot-7-fake-rea...

"So. What is coming tonight is something called Solo Nots. This is OT
VII. To put it in perspective, Arnie got raided for OT III.

This is NOT already on the net. I know that there's a doc that's been
circulating, that looks like it's been made up to look like one of the
tech vols, with all the OT levels in it, but I think that is some
thing put together by the Freezone guys, and isn't "official". I have
checked what I have against these, and it's not the same stuff.

All official dox have official headers, like the **********. In other
words, it will say "Hubbard Communications Office" at the top, and
then either "HCO Policy Letter" for policy, or "HCO Technical
Bulletin" for tech. These are original Tech Bulletins.

There are three "correction lists" one auditing issue and two more
auditing lists that are attachments. I'm talking in a little
scienospeak here, as this shit is so integral to them that some of it
has no regular english that is simple. The correction lists mean that
if someone fucks up an auditing session they can correct it. The lists
are the processes and commands for the level. These have NOT been up
before. That shit that is up is just something else, or something
created from someone's memory that is a different part, or an older
version that got changed, or something.

Think of Organized Scientology as a humongous, slow-moving but very
dangerous beast. It's got a LOT of little things running around at
it's feet, stabbing it and shooting arrows into it. It's listing. This
thing is going to make it stop, turn, and chase JUST ONE of those
little things at it's feet. Flat out. As crazy Arnie would say:
Geddit?

That's the best analogy I can give you. Fuck, we're not going to try
to tell you to be careful or take precautions, blah blah blah. I think
we'd just be making ourselves look like assholes.

There are A LOT of really fun things that are going to happen as a
result of this:

1. These released broadly make Organized Scieno pretty much obsolete.
Having the repair lists to this stuff is what the Freezoners were
missing to having the full tech on their own, free and in the public
domain. So you get to watch the nutball Freezoners and the nutball
Organized Scienos battle royal for the hearts and minds of the batshit
crazy people who believe this crap. This will start a war. Woo hoo!
Chaos is fun.

2. Everyone who has ever been subjected/exposed to this shit is going
to be ordered to Flag in Florida for interrogations. I mean EVERYBODY.
So if you have 100-200 people in each org that have been on 7 or
above, we're talking thousands of people.

Basically, they will all be "sec checked" at their own expense. Most
of the people that have gotten that high and left have left because
they got sick of this exact kind of shit-being resold stuff, ordered
around, getting unnecessary things done on them, getting extreme out
of pocket bills for all of it.

My analysis of this is that the Scienos will have a crazy knee-jerk
reaction to this, and further alienate people who have already begun
to question them, that Anonymous has gotten on the edge anyway, it it
will cause more of these people to leave.

3. Since this is the most sooper seekret stuff of all, they will not
be able to use all the little usual grunts in OSA to handle this as
hardly any of the Sea Org guys actually go up "the Bridge" themselves.
They may suspend that "don't look at OT materials" crap and let them,
but this is so far up, they may not be able to do that, and will have
trouble getting enough people on it.

4. This is going to TOTALLY interrupt anything else, any other attacks
they are working on. Whatever shit OSA is working on, it will be
shifted to this. I am also guessing that Moxon and whatever Ps they
have will be put onto this too. I am not bullshitting, I am not being
alarmist.

5. These will show that Tommy Davis and Organized Scilons are liars.
Period. It's all the shit he was denying, in their own fonts and
formatting and shit. So it could certainly be sent to CNN.

6. ????

7. Profit!"


يجب تسجيل الدخول قبل إرسال رسائلك.
لنشر رسالة يجب أولاً أن تنضم إلى هذه المجموعة.
يرجى تحديث اسم الشهرة الخاص بك على صفحة إعدادات الاشتراك قبل النشر.
لا يوجد لديك الإذن المطلوب للنشر.
redlegion  
عرض ملف التعريف
‏ (1 عضو)  خيارات أكثر 6 أكتوبر, 07:04
مجموعات أخبار: alt.religion.scientology
من: redlegion <redleg...@gmail.com>
التاريخ: Mon, 06 Oct 2008 01:04:18 -0400
محلّي: ‏الاثنين 6 أكتوبر 2008 07:04‏
الموضوع: ‏Re: OT7 Solo NOTs leaked apparently‏

jupu...@gmail.com wrote:
> Various documents have been leaked on several sites purporting to be
> the HCO Solo NOTs.  Can anyone shed any light on their authenticy?
> From whyweprotest.net: http://forums.whyweprotest.net/123-leaks-legal/previous-ot-7-fake-rea...

> "So. What is coming tonight is something called Solo Nots. This is OT
> VII. To put it in perspective, Arnie got raided for OT III.

> This is NOT already on the net. I know that there's a doc that's been
> circulating, that looks like it's been made up to look like one of the
> tech vols, with all the OT levels in it, but I think that is some
> thing put together by the Freezone guys, and isn't "official". I have
> checked what I have against these, and it's not the same stuff.

The stuff being circulated that you speak of, is it the stuff from
wikileaks? AFAIK, that stuff's for the most part pretty official.
I've compared it with an ancient leak of the NOTs pack from flag,
it seems to be fairly authentic.

** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

يجب تسجيل الدخول قبل إرسال رسائلك.
لنشر رسالة يجب أولاً أن تنضم إلى هذه المجموعة.
يرجى تحديث اسم الشهرة الخاص بك على صفحة إعدادات الاشتراك قبل النشر.
لا يوجد لديك الإذن المطلوب للنشر.
feministe  
عرض ملف التعريف
‏ (1 عضو)  خيارات أكثر 6 أكتوبر, 17:03
مجموعات أخبار: alt.religion.scientology
من: "feministe" <femini...@free.fr>
التاريخ: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 17:03:56 +0200
محلّي: ‏الاثنين 6 أكتوبر 2008 17:03‏
الموضوع: ‏Re: OT7 Solo NOTs leaked apparently‏
"redlegion" <redleg...@gmail.com> a écrit dans le message de
news:3683d$48e99c2e$22774@news.teranews.com...

Knowing a bit these materials, I confirm that they seem  genuine.

To scientology cretinized criminals from OSA: NO, I'm not the source of
these on Internet and I don't know who send them there.

r


يجب تسجيل الدخول قبل إرسال رسائلك.
لنشر رسالة يجب أولاً أن تنضم إلى هذه المجموعة.
يرجى تحديث اسم الشهرة الخاص بك على صفحة إعدادات الاشتراك قبل النشر.
لا يوجد لديك الإذن المطلوب للنشر.
Fredric L. Rice  
عرض ملف التعريف
‏ (1 عضو)  خيارات أكثر 7 أكتوبر, 05:13
مجموعات أخبار: alt.religion.scientology
من: fr...@skeptictank.org (Fredric L. Rice)
التاريخ: Tue, 07 Oct 2008 03:13:03 GMT
محلّي: ‏الثلاثاء 7 أكتوبر 2008 05:13‏
الموضوع: ‏Re: OT7 Solo NOTs leaked apparently‏

redlegion <redleg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>The stuff being circulated that you speak of, is it the stuff from
>wikileaks? AFAIK, that stuff's for the most part pretty official.
>I've compared it with an ancient leak of the NOTs pack from flag,
>it seems to be fairly authentic.

And the Scientology criminals have been claiming for decades that the
copy of OT7 widely available in public and in the Fishman Affidavit are
their property.  The WikiLeaks version is almost certainly the right one.

---
Enturbulation 2.0 is up: http://forums.whyweprotest.net/


يجب تسجيل الدخول قبل إرسال رسائلك.
لنشر رسالة يجب أولاً أن تنضم إلى هذه المجموعة.
يرجى تحديث اسم الشهرة الخاص بك على صفحة إعدادات الاشتراك قبل النشر.
لا يوجد لديك الإذن المطلوب للنشر.
نهاية الرسائل
« الرجوع إلى المناقشات « موضوع أحدث     موضوع أقدم »

إنشاء مجموعة - مجموعات Google - صفحة Google الرئيسية - شروط الخدمة - سياسة الخصوصية
©2008 Google